Computer sorting of mail just does not work as well as humans.
Recently I sent a letter to a friend who happens to live near the border of several towns. His legal residence is in one town in Vermont, while his mail is delivered by the post office in the adjacent town.
When I addressed the letter, I used his legal address, because that's the one I had used when finding his house using google maps.
The letter was returned to me as "no such street, unable to forward."
My friend reports that the human postal carriers were able to figure out such addressing, but the computer sorting facility cannot.
This is really annoying. I sent the letter to the correct, legal address of my friend's house. The fact that the postal service elects to deliver mail from the post office of the neighboring town is supposed to be for postal service convenience, not to inconvenience postal service customers. The computer should be programmed to figure such addresses rather than sending letters back to senders.
Even more annoying, when I went to usps.com, to try to send in an e-mail complaining of this situation, I found a bunch of options for complaining about mail service -- and none of the options applied to this situation. They don't have a category for "other" complaints. They can't imagine that someone might come up with a complaint that doesn't fall into the categories they have pre-selected.
Again a human being would be able to take a miscellaneous complaint that doesn't fit into other categories.
Tuesday, April 5, 2016
Friday, March 25, 2016
update on truth blog: 4th neutrino calls standard model into question
For my 25th college anniversary, I wrote this rather long document about my lifelong search for "truth:"
original truth blog
I think I was the only one who, in response to a question of what I had been doing since college, gave an intellectual history of myself, rather than an exclusively personal history. Aspects of my personal life came into it, but the focus was intellect.
It was one of about 3 essays in the 25th reunion book that was as long as it was. Most people confined themselves to a few paragraphs. I've often described myself as having diarrhea of the keyboard. Still a couple of my friends read it and liked it.
I noticed, though, that I was also the only one who ever wrote in to our college newsletter with a review of a book that I was excited about that I thought my classmates might like, because the author was a late, well-known professor from our college.
Granted it's nice to learn about weddings, kids, job changes, and moves -- but didn't we meet by going to college together? Wasn't that an intellectual endeavor? Didn't that make us feel like exchanging intellectual ideas?
Ok, nevermind.
Anyway, the truth essay was brought to mind to my mind today, because I read that a 4th neutrino had been tentatively identified, and that it was outside the Standard Model. The Standard Model is a family of sub-sub-atomic particles that replaced the earlier neutron/proton/electron atomic model of the elements -- to oversimplify.
The Standard Model was just starting to coalesce when I was in college and it was only just fully confirmed in 2009 with a believable study of the Top Quark, aka "god particle."
But, now, back to the drawing board, apparently, only five years later.
One aspect of my truth essay was the concept that science was violating Occam's razor. Science keeps getting more and more complex and elaborate. It has to have more and more theories. Exceptions to those theories keep getting found. It's never like we can get to a final theory and stop. Just when the Standard Model seemed like the definitive answer, something that doesn't fit into it is found.
This was one of the things that caused me to lose faith in physics and not pursue it professionally as an adult.
original truth blog
I think I was the only one who, in response to a question of what I had been doing since college, gave an intellectual history of myself, rather than an exclusively personal history. Aspects of my personal life came into it, but the focus was intellect.
It was one of about 3 essays in the 25th reunion book that was as long as it was. Most people confined themselves to a few paragraphs. I've often described myself as having diarrhea of the keyboard. Still a couple of my friends read it and liked it.
I noticed, though, that I was also the only one who ever wrote in to our college newsletter with a review of a book that I was excited about that I thought my classmates might like, because the author was a late, well-known professor from our college.
Granted it's nice to learn about weddings, kids, job changes, and moves -- but didn't we meet by going to college together? Wasn't that an intellectual endeavor? Didn't that make us feel like exchanging intellectual ideas?
Ok, nevermind.
Anyway, the truth essay was brought to mind to my mind today, because I read that a 4th neutrino had been tentatively identified, and that it was outside the Standard Model. The Standard Model is a family of sub-sub-atomic particles that replaced the earlier neutron/proton/electron atomic model of the elements -- to oversimplify.
The Standard Model was just starting to coalesce when I was in college and it was only just fully confirmed in 2009 with a believable study of the Top Quark, aka "god particle."
But, now, back to the drawing board, apparently, only five years later.
One aspect of my truth essay was the concept that science was violating Occam's razor. Science keeps getting more and more complex and elaborate. It has to have more and more theories. Exceptions to those theories keep getting found. It's never like we can get to a final theory and stop. Just when the Standard Model seemed like the definitive answer, something that doesn't fit into it is found.
This was one of the things that caused me to lose faith in physics and not pursue it professionally as an adult.
*****
Here's another one of those -- physics is not complete issues
Why is the universe expanding? At least, astronomers believe it is expanding. Studying astronomy was part of what made me lose faith in physics. Trying to grasp the enormity of the universe, helped me see how very small we are in comparison. The idea that we could really understand it seemed absurd.
Monday, March 14, 2016
Lady Sketch Lab 2016
I have been participating in the 2016 Lady Sketch Lab at the Magnet Theater. This lab started out with 84 women. By the end we were down to 50, which is still a huge group. Most of us submitted sketches, with several drafts. Then some sketches were selected for the show.
I was cast as Narrator in "Extraordinary Woman" and Passenger (an improv role) in "Love Train."
This show is scheduled to run March 14, 21, and 28 at 9pm at The Magnet Theater, 254 W 29th St (near 8th ave), NYC
I was cast as Narrator in "Extraordinary Woman" and Passenger (an improv role) in "Love Train."
This show is scheduled to run March 14, 21, and 28 at 9pm at The Magnet Theater, 254 W 29th St (near 8th ave), NYC
List of sketches
ORDER OF THE SHOW |
Love Train Part 1 |
Bouncer |
Man Springs |
Vous Tube |
Vicki & Sue |
The Art of Social Media |
Love Train Part 2 |
You've Got Mail |
Extraordinary Woman |
Defense Dress |
Baby Fat |
Threesome |
Yoga Farts |
Hello |
Love Train Part 3 |
Here's a cast photo of the Extraordinary Woman sketch
And here was the entire cast
Sunday, March 13, 2016
Program for Murder on the Nile 3/10/16-3/12/16
I was in an Alpha NYC production of Murder on the Nile 3/10-12 -- team A. Here is a copy of the program:
Monday, March 7, 2016
updates 160307
I have the following performances upcoming:
3/10, 11 &12 I will be playing Miss Ffoliot-ffoulkes at an AlphaNYC production of “Murder on the Nile” by Agatha Christie at the Producer’s Club
3/13 I will be again participating in the Cabaret showdown
3/14, 21 & 28 I will be participating in sketch shows at The Magnet Theater with the Lady Sketch Lab
3/18 Acting in sitcom The Cobblestone Corridor with Connecticut Public Broadcasting
3/22 I will again be participating in a charity fundraiser sponsored by The SetNYC at the Lovecraft Bar
I particularly want to tell you about these fundraisers. Pim Shih has been doing a series . Performers donate their times and some of the proceeds go to benefit deserving charities, especially to help the homeless. Each show doesn’t generate all that much money, but it adds up over time, as Pim keeps doing more events. March 22 is the third time I’m going to be doing a monologue.
I think it would be nice if some casting directors and agents were to participate at these events, because it would raise the stakes and increase the amount that is raised.
Here’s a new voiceover demo:
https://soundcloud.com/anne-barschall/thriller-rap
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50WujTK-v-4
Curriculum for a life skills course
This is a list of topics to be dealt with in high school curricula. I originally wrote this back in 2007 or 2008, but I don't think I posted it publicly anywhere. Some of these things may be taught in health classes, but not all of them.
I became interested in this topic, partly because I served as a volunteer in my school district on the committees where decisions were made regarding programs for special needs kids. I learned that life skills were taught to students with intellectual disabilities, but not to kids without disabilities. Why? I don't think kids normally absorb all the life skills they need, especially now that they're always glued to the computer.
Later, I got interested in these topics as a possible curriculum for a course to be taught in college. I certainly didn't have a good grasp on these topics by the time I graduated. I probably still don't.
·
Personal & business ethics;
·
Developmental psychology, so future citizens know how to raise our
children without abusing them [e.g. we're constantly reading stories of parents who murder small children over toilet training issues or by shaking them when they're babies -- likely all due to ignorance of child development; and it would be good to learn to recognize learning and emotional issues such
as those exhibited Asperger's Syndrome, dyslexia, ADD, mood disorders and the like and know how
to address them proactively from the start;
·
Relationship and negotiating skills, so future citizens know how to
deal with spouses, other family members, co-workers (including supervisors,
colleagues, and subordinates), competitors, neighbors, and friends;
·
Time & money management;
·
Career planning;
·
What to expect physically and psychologically as you age;
·
Basic first aid and recognizing dangerous health symptoms;
·
Dealing with personal crises: family and personal illness, loss of job,
loss or illness of family members; and
·
Personal physical fitness and nutrition programs, for lifelong health
in an aging body.
I became interested in this topic, partly because I served as a volunteer in my school district on the committees where decisions were made regarding programs for special needs kids. I learned that life skills were taught to students with intellectual disabilities, but not to kids without disabilities. Why? I don't think kids normally absorb all the life skills they need, especially now that they're always glued to the computer.
Later, I got interested in these topics as a possible curriculum for a course to be taught in college. I certainly didn't have a good grasp on these topics by the time I graduated. I probably still don't.
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
Implications of free college
College affordability is getting to be a hot button political
issue. President Obama addressed this in the state of the union speech
1/12/16. Addressing this issue is a good
thing, but it needs to be examined more closely
Right now, too many people are going to college, more than the
economy can support.
Not enough people are going into skilled trades. Entry procedures
into lucrative trades such as plumbing and electrical are corrupt. Entry is
dependent on knowing someone who will take one on as a journeyman or
apprentice. The old boy network is resulting in incompetent practitioners who
break things in my house. Entry into these professions needs to be more
transparent like entry into law or medicine.
We need to stop regarding traditional college as the solution to
employment problems. We need to educate people in how to run and start a
business. We shouldn’t
necessarily be encouraging so many people to go to college.
We have to reverse the process that has eliminated vocational
courses from high schools, focusing them exclusively on college prep. We are
raising a generation of people who are helpless to do ordinary things.
A couple of anecdotes:
This year, I attended a symposium at the University of Wisconsin
in memory of my father, Heinz Barschall, and celebrating his colleague, Willy
Haeberli. This occasion was timed to approximately coincide with my late
father's 100th birthday and Willy’s 90th.
My father was a professor at the University of Wisconsin,
Madison. For most of his career, he focused on nuclear physics. At this
symposium, I learned that in seeking graduate students to study in his
experimental physics lab, he preferred students who had been raised on farms,
because these students knew how to build things, especially experimental equipment.
I remember my father saying that American students were always
better than foreign students.
My kids went to a high school that had eliminated shop classes. I
would say that they were effectively educated to be helpless.
I was an exchange student in France back in the 1970’s.
The French educational system has always prided itself on being
free; however, my impression was that the system was more focused on weeding
students out than on educating them. There were exams at the ends of middle and
high school -- intended to force most students to flunk. At the university,
amongst students who had already been through the first two exams, only 50% got
through the first degree, which was called "license." The whole system was designed with the idea
that it was free, but study beyond the teen years was generally only available
to those who could pass these exams.
I feel that this process damaged the self-esteem of most French
people and has resulted in that country having generally more unemployment and
less entrepreneurship than here. The "free" education system in
France, at least back then, had a horrific human cost, in terms of pressure on
and damage to children. I saw rather alarming and obvious mental illness
amongst members of my high school class there that I never saw in my American
high school.
I would submit that that human cost ultimately damages their
economy as well.
Our system has been based on the hope of making everyone
successful with easy, empowering courses. This is better for students. This
results in increased creativity, confidence, and problem solving ability. We
should not be rushing to imitate foreign educational systems. The pressure I've seen on students in the NYC
metro area, where my kids grew up, is very damaging, especially to boys, who
develop more slowly than girls and can't cope with that pressure.
Comparisons between our high schools and foreign high schools are
also very misleading, because in foreign countries a large percentage of
students, perhaps a even a majority, aren’t necessarily finishing high school
and are therefore not part of these tests.
Saying we are going to make college free is not necessarily a
good solution. It will encourage even
more students to go to college, when too many people are already going to
college. It also will put many students
into higher pressure academic environments that are not necessarily good for
them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)