I asked Grok the following:
Which is most secure: 1) WhatsApp; 2) Facebook Messenger; 3) Signal; 4) Slack; 5) Discord; or 6) Ordinary SMS text messages? Please compare and contrast.
This was the response:
When evaluating the security of messaging platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Signal, Slack, Discord, and ordinary SMS text messages, the key factors to consider are encryption, privacy policies, data handling, and vulnerabilities. Here's a breakdown:
WhatsApp:
Encryption: Uses end-to-end encryption (E2EE) by default for all chats, meaning only the sender and recipient can read the messages. This is based on the Signal Protocol.
Pros: Strong encryption, widely used, supports E2EE for backups if enabled with a password.
Cons: Owned by Meta, which collects metadata (e.g., who you message, when, and for how long). Privacy policy allows some data sharing with Meta’s ecosystem. Vulnerable to social engineering or account takeover if someone accesses your phone number.
Facebook Messenger:
Encryption: E2EE is available but not default—you must opt into "Secret Conversations." Regular chats are encrypted in transit but accessible to Meta on their servers.
Pros: Convenient for Facebook users, integrates with a large ecosystem.
Cons: Weak privacy due to Meta’s data collection (metadata and, in non-E2EE chats, content). Not designed with security as a priority.
Signal:
Encryption: E2EE by default for all messages, calls, and even metadata protection features like sealed sender. Open-source code, audited regularly.
Pros: Gold standard for privacy and security. Collects minimal data (only phone number), nonprofit model, no ads or tracking.
Cons: Smaller user base, lacks some features of less secure platforms (e.g., extensive integrations).
Slack:
Encryption: Encrypted in transit and at rest, but not E2EE—Slack admins and the company can access message content. Enterprise versions offer more control.
Pros: Great for team collaboration, integrates with workflows.
Cons: Not built for personal security. Messages are readable by workspace admins and Slack itself, making it unsuitable for sensitive private communication.
Discord:
Encryption: Encrypted in transit and at rest, but not E2EE. Discord can access message content, especially in public servers.
Pros: Excellent for gaming and communities, customizable.
Cons: Privacy-focused users should beware—data is stored centrally, and the company complies with legal requests. Private DMs are safer but still not E2EE.
Ordinary SMS Text Messages:
Encryption: None. Messages are sent in plaintext over carrier networks and stored unencrypted by providers.
Pros: Universally available, no app required.
Cons: Extremely insecure—carriers, governments, or anyone intercepting signals can read them. Vulnerable to SIM swapping and spoofing.
Comparison and Verdict
Most Secure: Signal stands out as the most secure due to its default E2EE, minimal data collection, and open-source transparency. It’s purpose-built for privacy.
Runner-Up: WhatsApp offers robust E2EE but is compromised by Meta’s metadata collection and potential ecosystem integration risks.
Middle Ground: Slack and Discord are designed for collaboration, not privacy, and lack E2EE, making them less secure for personal use.
Least Secure: Facebook Messenger (without Secret Conversations) and SMS are the weakest. SMS is effectively obsolete for secure communication due to zero encryption, while Messenger’s opt-in E2EE and Meta’s data hunger limit its trustworthiness.
If security is your top priority, use Signal. For a balance of security and convenience with a larger user base, WhatsApp is a decent compromise. Avoid SMS and non-E2EE Messenger for anything sensitive. Slack and Discord are fine for casual or professional use but not for privacy-critical conversations.
****
Tho, apparently, there are concerns with Signal being vulnerable to hackers
