Tulsi accused them, in the debate, of stating that she was a Russian Asset. They denied it. They also said other things about her presentation. This is what I wrote
I find your response today to Tulsi's criticism of you unsatisfactory.
You
say you haven't called her a "Russian Asset." I haven't read all your
articles about her, but I wonder whether you haven't quoted someone as
saying that, without contradicting the quote. I think I've read
something of that sort in your paper. Repeating that kind of
inflammatory language, without disagreeing, is like a tacit endorsement.
You
say she's an isolationist, but opposing regime change wars is not
isolationist. She is all in favor of international negotiation. Your
calling her isolationist is pure propaganda in favor of a militarist
agenda.
Also, you say the war in
Syria is not a regime change war. What is your response to Professor
Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia who has said that our CIA started this war
with a desire to overthrow the Syrian government? He said this on
MSNBC.
No comments:
Post a Comment